Re: perf: more ABI breakage

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Mon Jul 08 2013 - 12:48:28 EST


On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 11:24:18AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
>
> I guess I should have been noisier about this at the time.
>
> Linux 3.9 came with commit
> e259514eef764a5286873618e34c560ecb6cff13
> that enabled AMD fam15h Northbridge support, by exposing the events as
> part of the core CPU.
>
> Then Linux 3.10 changed this with
> c43ca5091a374c1f6778bd7e4a39a5a10735a917
> and split them out as a separate PMU.
>
> This of course breaks libpfm4 and thus PAPI

Urgh, so the 3.9 patches should never have been merged and sunk in while I was
doing my vegetable imitation.

Stephane agreed with the change in 3.10; and I suppose he overlooked the fact
that people were already using it :/ I specifically asked if there were already
users as that would indeed require some form of backwards compatibility --
however annoying.

But to answer your question, no we should not blindly break stuff like this --
but yeah it would have been ever so much more useful for people to report this
before we ship a release.

Stephane; do you see a sane way to bridge this now?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/