Rebased for_next branch in my linux-fs git tree

[Jan Kara]

  Hello Stephen,

  I'm just writing this to let you know that I had to rebase for_next
branch in my linux-fs git tree because I've messed up my tree and for_linus
& for_next branches contained the same patches but with different commit
IDs (fast track fixes). When I pulled for_next into for_linus branch,
the changelog had commit logs for those patches twice which was rather
confusing. The only solution I found was to rebase for_next on top of
for_linus to get rid of the duplicate patches. If there's a cleaner
solution of the situation, I'm happy to learn it for future...

This is just that you know what's going on when you are doing your merge
window statistics :).

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/