Re: [ 00/17] 3.0.84-stable review

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Tue Jun 25 2013 - 15:39:51 EST


On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:32:26PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Günther,
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Build m68k:defconfig passed
> > Build m68k:apollo_defconfig passed
> > Build m68k:m5272c3_defconfig failed
> > Build m68k:m5307c3_defconfig failed
> > Build m68k:m5249evb_defconfig failed
> > Build m68k:m5407c3_defconfig failed
> > Build m68k:mac_defconfig passed
> > Build m68k:multi_defconfig passed
> > Build m68k:sun3_defconfig passed
> > Build m68k:sun3x_defconfig passed
> > Build m68k:mvme16x_defconfig passed
> > Build m68k:hp300_defconfig passed
>
> m68k:defconfig is an alias for m68k:multi_defconfig, so you can drop
> one of them.
>
> Furthermore, m68k:multi_defconfig is the union of all m68k "classic MMU"
> defconfigs, except for sun3_defconfig (due to the incompatible MMU type).
> Hence dropping apollo_defconfig, mac_defconfig, sun3x_defconfig,
> mvme16x_defconfig, and hp300_defconfig would reduce your build coverage
> only marginally. Of course, if you have too many spare cycles ;-)
>
Thanks, I'll do that. The complete build for three releases takes 15+ hours
with i7-3700k, so reducing that a bit doesn't hurt.

Would there be any useful builds to add ?

Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/