Re: [ 00/17] 3.0.84-stable review

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi GÃnther,

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Build m68k:defconfig passed
> Build m68k:apollo_defconfig passed
> Build m68k:m5272c3_defconfig failed
> Build m68k:m5307c3_defconfig failed
> Build m68k:m5249evb_defconfig failed
> Build m68k:m5407c3_defconfig failed
> Build m68k:mac_defconfig passed
> Build m68k:multi_defconfig passed
> Build m68k:sun3_defconfig passed
> Build m68k:sun3x_defconfig passed
> Build m68k:mvme16x_defconfig passed
> Build m68k:hp300_defconfig passed

m68k:defconfig is an alias for m68k:multi_defconfig, so you can drop
one of them.

Furthermore, m68k:multi_defconfig is the union of all m68k "classic MMU"
defconfigs, except for sun3_defconfig (due to the incompatible MMU type).
Hence dropping apollo_defconfig, mac_defconfig, sun3x_defconfig,
mvme16x_defconfig, and hp300_defconfig would reduce your build coverage
only marginally. Of course, if you have too many spare cycles ;-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/