Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/pci: Deal with toolstack missingan 'XenbusStateClosing'.

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 10.06.13 at 23:06, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There are two tool-stack that can instruct the Xen PCI frontend
> and backend to change states: 'xm' (Python code with a daemon),
> and 'xl' (C library - does not keep state changes).
> 
> With the 'xm', the path to disconnect a PCI device (xm pci-detach
> <guest> <BDF>)is:
> 
> 4(Connected)->7(Reconfiguring*)-> 8(Reconfigured)-> 4(Connected)->5(Closing*).
> 
> The * is for states that the tool-stack sets. For 'xl', it is similar:
> 
> 4(Connected)->7(Reconfiguring*)-> 8(Reconfigured)-> 4(Connected)
> 
> Both of them also tear down the XenBus structure, so the backend
> state ends up going in the 3(Initialised) and calls pcifront_xenbus_remove.
> 
> When a PCI device is plugged in (xm pci-attach <guest> <BDF>)
> both of them follow the same pattern:
> 2(InitWait*), 3(Initialized*), 4(Connected*)->4(Connected).
> 
> [xen-pcifront ignores the 2,3 state changes and only acts when
> 4 (Connected) has been reached]
> 
> The problem is that git commit 3d925320e9e2de162bd138bf97816bda8c3f71be
> ("xen/pcifront: Use Xen-SWIOTLB when initting if required") introduced
> a mechanism to initialize the SWIOTLB when the Xen PCI front moves to
> Connected state. It also had some aggressive seatbelt code check that
> would warn the user if one tried to change to Connected state without
> hitting first the Closing state:
> 
>  pcifront pci-0: PCI frontend already installed!
> 
> However, that code can be relaxed and we can continue on working
> even if the frontend is instructed to be the 'Connected' state with
> no devices and then gets tickled to be in 'Connected' state again.
> 
> In other words, this 4(Connected)->5(Closing)->4(Connected) state
> was expected, while 4(Connected)->.... anything but 5(Closing)->4(Connected)
> was not. This patch removes that aggressive check and allows
> Xen pcifront to work with the 'xl' toolstack.

I actually think this shouldn't be worked around here, but fixed in
xl. Any device removed from a guest should be driven towards
the "Closed" state.

Jan

> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c b/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> index ac99515..cc46e253 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> @@ -675,10 +675,9 @@ static int pcifront_connect_and_init_dma(struct 
> pcifront_device *pdev)
>  	if (!pcifront_dev) {
>  		dev_info(&pdev->xdev->dev, "Installing PCI frontend\n");
>  		pcifront_dev = pdev;
> -	} else {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->xdev->dev, "PCI frontend already installed!\n");
> +	} else
>  		err = -EEXIST;
> -	}
> +
>  	spin_unlock(&pcifront_dev_lock);
>  
>  	if (!err && !swiotlb_nr_tbl()) {
> @@ -846,7 +845,7 @@ static int pcifront_try_connect(struct pcifront_device 
> *pdev)
>  		goto out;
>  
>  	err = pcifront_connect_and_init_dma(pdev);
> -	if (err) {
> +	if (err && err != -EEXIST) {
>  		xenbus_dev_fatal(pdev->xdev, err,
>  				 "Error setting up PCI Frontend");
>  		goto out;
> -- 
> 1.8.1.4
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel 



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/