Re: [RFC] Comparison of power-efficient scheduling patch sets

[Alex Shi]

On 05/31/2013 09:17 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
>> > Kernel: 3.9
>> > 
>> > Patch sets:
>> > rlb-v4: sched: use runnable load based balance (Alex Shi)
>> >         <https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/27/13>
> Thanks for the valuable comparison!
> 
> The runnable load balance target is performance. It is still try to
> disperse tasks to as much as possible CPUs. :)
> The latest v7 version remove the 6th patch(wake_affine change) in v4.
> and plus fix a slept time double counting issue, and remove
> blocked_load_avg in tg load.
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1498988

Even the rlb patch set target is performance, Maybe the power benefit is
due to better balancing?

Anyway I appreciate if you like to test the latest v7 version. :)
https://github.com/alexshi/power-scheduling.git runnablelb

-- 
Thanks
    Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/