Re: [PATCH] ASoC: max98090: request IRQF_ONESHOT interrupt

[Mark Brown]

On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:58:07PM -0700, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> request_threaded_irq() rejects calls which both do not specify a handler
> (indicating that the primary IRQ handler should be used) and do not set
> IRQF_ONESHOT because the combination is unsafe with level-triggered
> interrupts.  It is safe in this case, though, since max98090 IRQs are

Applied, thanks.  If request_threaded_irq() is rejecting these that's
not ideal - some threaded interrupts can only be generated from within
threaded context and therefore can't have primary handlers.  Unless it
only rejects in the case where the parent IRQ is a hard IRQ of course.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature