[PATCH] ASoC: max98090: request IRQF_ONESHOT interrupt

From: Andrew Bresticker
Date: Mon May 20 2013 - 01:58:38 EST

request_threaded_irq() rejects calls which both do not specify a handler
(indicating that the primary IRQ handler should be used) and do not set
IRQF_ONESHOT because the combination is unsafe with level-triggered
interrupts. It is safe in this case, though, since max98090 IRQs are
edge-triggered and the interrupts aren't ACK'ed until the codec's IRQ
status register is read. Because of this, an IRQF_ONESHOT interrupt
doesn't really make a difference, but request one anyway in order to make
request_threaded_irq() happy.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
sound/soc/codecs/max98090.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/max98090.c b/sound/soc/codecs/max98090.c
index cbb272b..1bf96bd 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/max98090.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/max98090.c
@@ -2247,7 +2247,7 @@ static int max98090_probe(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
dev_dbg(codec->dev, "irq = %d\n", max98090->irq);

ret = request_threaded_irq(max98090->irq, NULL,
- max98090_interrupt, IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING,
+ max98090_interrupt, IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
"max98090_interrupt", codec);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(codec->dev, "request_irq failed: %d\n",

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/