Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/4] net: implement support for low latencysocket polling

From: Joe Perches
Date: Mon May 20 2013 - 04:30:01 EST

On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 00:54 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > {
> > struct socket *sock;
> > + unsigned int poll_result;
> Please order local variable declarations from longest line to
> shortest line.

reverse christmas tree doesn't seem especially valuable or
sensible for automatics.

I'd rather order by first use or even alphabetical, especially
with long lists of automatics.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at