Re: [PATCH] ARM: exynos: Select PINCTRL_EXYNOS for exynos5

[Doug Anderson]

Olof,

On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Seems like this should be selected by the SoC (ARCH_EXYNOS5) instead
> of the board. Actually, I'm not sure we need the board Kconfig entry
> long-term; all boards will be dt-only.

Good point.  Hopefully someone at Samsung can work on removing the
board itself?  If you'd like me to take this on then let me know and I
can put it on my list.

I'm happy to resubmit my patch under ARCH_EXYNOS5.  I'll move the
exynos4 one at the same time.

I'm going to make the assumption that PINCTRL_EXYNOS and
PINCTRL_EXYNOS5440 can happily coexist.  Certainly I've got both
defined in my tree right now and nothing blows up.  I haven't tested
on 5440 but things ought to be handled by "compatible" checks, right?

I'll also assume that eventually someone will move PINCTRL_EXYNOS5440
into PINCTRL_EXYNOS.  If PINCTRL_EXYNOS5440 won't eventually move
under PINCTRL_EXYNOS then it makes less sense to define PINCTRL_EXYNOS
for all exynos parts.

-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/