Re: [PATCH 0/7] uretprobes: return probes implementation

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 03/23, Anton Arapov wrote:
>
>   IIUC, Oleg have stressed that perf and trace events requires
> additional code to leverage the return probes. IOW this patchset
> implements core only and to use it we need to teach the perf about
> rp_handler().

Yes,

>   And I don't see why we would need additional parameter for
> rp_handler() as well.

trace_uprobe should use the same fmt = "(%lx <- %lx)" to teport
"entry <- exit" info, like trace_kprobe does.

And note that, unlike kprobe, the same function can be mmapped at
different address by different (or even the same) tasks.



But mostly I just wanted to say that yes, we will also teach
trace_uprobe to use the new feature before we ask to merge this
code.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/