Re: [PATCH 0/7] uretprobes: return probes implementation

From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Sat Mar 23 2013 - 14:00:28 EST

On 03/22, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 03/22/2013 08:10 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > This looks simple, but probably we need to add the additional "ulong bp_vaddr"
> > argument for rp_handler().
> FWIW, in SystemTap we don't currently do anything that would need
> bp_vaddr.

I know. This is not for systemtap.

> The uprobe_consumer already gives the context, so I'm not
> sure what else you would do with the *entry* address of the function
> that just returned.

context - yes, but not address (by the time ret_handler is called).


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at