Re: PREEMPT_RT vs 'hrtimer: Prevent hrtimer_enqueue_reprogramrace'
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Fri Mar 22 2013 - 05:29:05 EST
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 03:24 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Note, I posted a fix on Tuesday:
> > >
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/19/369
> > Thanks. I did search GMANE with some obvious terms but I think its
> > index is lagging.
> It didn't help that my subject had no mention of -rt in it :-(
> > I'm rebasing the rt patch series generated with
> > 'git format-patch v3.2.39..v3.2.39-rt59-rebase' on top of v3.2.41 (plus
> > Debian changes, which introduce some trivial textual conflicts).
> Ah, OK, I do it the opposite way. As the stable rt git never rebases, I
> always merge the latest stable into my tree. I then create a rebased
> tree as well. When I do that, I'm sure I'll end up fixing the patches up
> pretty much the same as you have.
Looks correct. The fixup is pretty obvious.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/