Re: PREEMPT_RT vs 'hrtimer: Prevent hrtimer_enqueue_reprogram race'

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Thu Mar 21 2013 - 23:34:41 EST


On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 03:24 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:

> > Note, I posted a fix on Tuesday:
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/19/369
>
> Thanks. I did search GMANE with some obvious terms but I think its
> index is lagging.

It didn't help that my subject had no mention of -rt in it :-(

> I'm rebasing the rt patch series generated with
> 'git format-patch v3.2.39..v3.2.39-rt59-rebase' on top of v3.2.41 (plus
> Debian changes, which introduce some trivial textual conflicts).

Ah, OK, I do it the opposite way. As the stable rt git never rebases, I
always merge the latest stable into my tree. I then create a rebased
tree as well. When I do that, I'm sure I'll end up fixing the patches up
pretty much the same as you have.

Thanks,

-- Steve



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/