Re: [PATCH] sound: max98090: Remove executable bit
From: Mark Brown
Date: Thu Mar 21 2013 - 14:45:14 EST
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:53:13AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 18:44 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > That one needs a bit more taste and thought to work out what's
> > appropraite than can be guaranteed easily with a script, things like
> > working out drive level prefixes for example.
> [perfectly useful git applypatch-msg hook script removed]
No, it really isn't. Have you tried looking at the output? It's not
going to do the right thing for the subject line here for example, never
mind any other cases.
> > No, that's going to leave essentially every commit that needs fixing up
> > still needing manual fixup.
> Then I'm sure that's your job as a maintainer
> to modify whatever patches you get to suit your
One of the things I'd really expect that a frequent submitter of trivial
patches would be doing is to make an effort to improve the quality of
what is being sent. If it's at the point where you're sending a lot of
patches and it's more effort to apply them than to review them there's a
This is something that generally causes no problems for submitters...
Description: Digital signature