Re: [PATCH] sound: max98090: Remove executable bit

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:53:13AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 18:44 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > That one needs a bit more taste and thought to work out what's
> > appropraite than can be guaranteed easily with a script, things like
> > working out drive level prefixes for example.

> [perfectly useful git applypatch-msg hook script removed]

No, it really isn't.  Have you tried looking at the output?  It's not
going to do the right thing for the subject line here for example, never
mind any other cases.

> > No, that's going to leave essentially every commit that needs fixing up
> > still needing manual fixup.

> Then I'm sure that's your job as a maintainer
> to modify whatever patches you get to suit your
> taste.

One of the things I'd really expect that a frequent submitter of trivial
patches would be doing is to make an effort to improve the quality of
what is being sent.  If it's at the point where you're sending a lot of
patches and it's more effort to apply them than to review them there's a
problem.

This is something that generally causes no problems for submitters...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature