RE: New copyfile system call - discuss before LSF?
From: Myklebust, Trond
Date: Fri Feb 22 2013 - 17:48:29 EST
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zach Brown [mailto:zab@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 1:22 PM
> To: Ric Wheeler
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini; Myklebust, Trond; Linux FS Devel; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Chris L. Mason; Christoph Hellwig; Alexander Viro;
> Martin K. Petersen; Hannes Reinecke; Joel Becker
> Subject: Re: New copyfile system call - discuss before LSF?
> > This seems to be suspiciously close to a clear consensus on how to
> > move forward after many years of spinning our wheels. Anyone want to
> > promote an actual patch before we change our collective minds?
> It seems like we'd want to start with the exisiting (presumably
> bitrotten) prototypes that Trond has for nfs and that Martin has for
> block->scsi. Mash the new syscall on top of and get them working in
> current mainline.
> I'd be happy to take responsibility for making forward progress if no one else
> has the bandwidth.
> Trond, Martin, would that make sense? Are the most recent versions of the
> prototypes available somewhere?
The wildly bitrotten NFS copyfile prototype can be found on
Please open with extreme caution and apply the resulting patches to a Linux 220.127.116.11 kernel...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/