Re: [ 0/1] 3.4.33-stable review
From: Shuah Khan
Date: Tue Feb 19 2013 - 22:31:20 EST
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 07:50:16PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.33 release.
>> > There is 1 patch in this series, which will be posted as a response to
>> > this one. If anyone has any issues with it being applied, please let me
>> > know.
>> > Responses should be made by Wed Feb 20 18:13:44 UTC 2013.
>> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.4.33-rc1.gz
>> > and the diffstat can be found below.
>> > thanks,
>> > greg k-h
>> > -------------
>> Patches applied cleanly to 3.0.65, and 3.4.32
>> Compiled and booted on the following systems:
>> HP EliteBook 6930p Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9400 @ 2.53GHz
>> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics
>> Reviewed patches
>> Skipped Cross-compile tests
> Thanks for testing, your kernel log messages looked correct, right?
> greg k-h
Yes, should have mentioned that I checked dmesg and syslog both and
with the old dmesg I saved from the previous rc-1 testing for each of
these releases. Didn't
see anything that jumped out at me. I usually save dmesg from rc
cycles to look for regressions
if any from one rc cycle to the next.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/