Re: [ 00/66] 3.2.39-stable review
From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Tue Feb 19 2013 - 21:59:17 EST
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 07:25 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> At Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:50:01 +0000,
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.39 release.
> > There are 66 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > Responses should be made by Tue Feb 19 23:00:00 UTC 2013.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > A combined patch relative to 3.2.38 will be posted as an additional
> > response to this. A shortlog and diffstat can be found below.
> This kernel can be built and boot without any problem.
> Building a kernel with this kernel also works fine.
> - Build Machine: debian wheezy x86_64
> CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4
> memory: 8GB
> - Test machine: debian wheezy x86_64(KVM guest on the Build Machine)
> vCPU: x2
> memory: 2GB
> I reviewed the following patches and it looks good to me.
Sturgeon's Law: Ninety percent of everything is crap.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part