Re: [ 00/66] 3.2.39-stable review

From: Satoru Takeuchi
Date: Tue Feb 19 2013 - 17:26:08 EST

At Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:50:01 +0000,
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.39 release.
> There are 66 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> Responses should be made by Tue Feb 19 23:00:00 UTC 2013.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> A combined patch relative to 3.2.38 will be posted as an additional
> response to this. A shortlog and diffstat can be found below.

This kernel can be built and boot without any problem.
Building a kernel with this kernel also works fine.

- Build Machine: debian wheezy x86_64
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4
memory: 8GB

- Test machine: debian wheezy x86_64(KVM guest on the Build Machine)
vCPU: x2
memory: 2GB

I reviewed the following patches and it looks good to me.

> Oleg Nesterov (5):
> wake_up_process() should be never used to wakeup a TASK_STOPPED/TRACED task
> [9067ac85d533651b98c2ff903182a20cbb361fcb]
> Shawn Bohrer (1):
> sched/rt: Use root_domain of rt_rq not current processor
> [aa7f67304d1a03180f463258aa6f15a8b434e77d]
> Sjur BrÃÂndeland (1):
> virtio_console: Don't access uninitialized data.
> [aded024a12b32fc1ed9a80639681daae2d07ec25]
> Stephen Hemminger (1):
> MAINTAINERS: Stephen Hemminger email change
> [adbbf69d1a54abf424e91875746a610dcc80017d]

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at