Re: uhid: broken interface: 32/64-bit compatibility
From: Johan Hedberg
Date: Fri Feb 15 2013 - 07:00:39 EST
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013, David Herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov
> <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi David and all,
> > There's claim in uhid.h that the interface is "compatible even between
> > architectures". But it obviously is not true: struct uhid_create_req
> > contains pointer which breaks everything.
> > The easy way to demonstrate the issue is compile uhid-example.c with -m32
> > and try to run it on 64 bit kernel. Creating of the device will fail.
> Indeed, we missed that. We should probably also notify the HIDP
> developers as "struct hidp_connadd_req" suffers from the same
> problems. (CC'ed)
> > I don't see an easy way to fix this. Few options:
> > 1. Replace the pointer with u64. It will fix the issue, but it breaks ABI
> > which is never a good idea. Not sure how many users interface already
> > has.
> The only users I am aware of is an HID debugging tool and experimental
> HoG Bluetooth support (bluez). Maybe Marcel or Johan can comment
> whether this is already used by bluez-5? If it is, then we shouldn't
> break ABI and go with #2+#3. Otherwise, I think changing to u64 should
> be ok.
> On the other hand, it would break any future build for older stable
> kernels so not breaking ABI is probably the best idea. Any comments? I
> can add a COMPAT fix and a comment to fix this in the next version of
The HoG code in BlueZ 5 does indeed use this API and it's also not
anymore behind any kind of experimental flag (i.e. it is an officially
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/