Re: [PATCH] sched: fix env->src_cpu for active migration
From: Damien Wyart
Date: Wed Feb 13 2013 - 13:47:15 EST
* Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx> [2013-02-13 18:49]:
> I have look into Frederic's tree but i didn't find any reason that
> could explain your problem. May be Frederic will have some ideas
> I have also tested his branch with and without my patch and both
> kernel are booting (on an ARM platform without using the full_nohz
> feature ). I have faced a conflict when i have applied my patch on his
> branch as we insert code at the same place. You should have faced the
> same conflict. How have you solved it ?
Bingo, that was the problem in my setup: as the patch was applied
through a script with others, I had missed the error message about the
conflict (I have also another conflict which can be safely ignored so
the new one did not catch my eye)... So the patch was only half-applied,
and the final code is broken.
How did you solve the conflict (I am not a scheduler expert)? I can
retry running the patched kernel with your resolution, to check if
everything is ok.
Thanks and sorry for this,
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/