Re: [PATCH] intel/iommu: force writebuffer-flush quirk on Gen 4 Chipsets

[Daniel Vetter]

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:55 PM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 19:48 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> We already have the quirk entry for the mobile platform, but also
>> reports on some desktop versions. So be paranoid and set it
>> everywhere.
>>
>> References: http://www.mail-archive.com/dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg33138.html
>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reported-and-tested-by: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@xxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c |    8 +++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> index 9743769..19854bf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> @@ -4215,13 +4215,19 @@ static void __devinit quirk_iommu_rwbf(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>  {
>>       /*
>>        * Mobile 4 Series Chipset neglects to set RWBF capability,
>> -      * but needs it:
>> +      * but needs it. Same seems to hold for the desktop versions.
>>        */
>>       printk(KERN_INFO "DMAR: Forcing write-buffer flush capability\n");
>>       rwbf_quirk = 1;
>>  }
>>
>>  DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x2a40, quirk_iommu_rwbf);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x2e00, quirk_iommu_rwbf);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x2e10, quirk_iommu_rwbf);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x2e20, quirk_iommu_rwbf);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x2e30, quirk_iommu_rwbf);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x2e40, quirk_iommu_rwbf);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x2e90, quirk_iommu_rwbf);
>>
>>  #define GGC 0x52
>>  #define GGC_MEMORY_SIZE_MASK (0xf << 8)
>
> Again, I'm really unhappy about doing this kind of thing based on
> hearsay. This should have a specific reference (with URL) to a published
> erratum. Rajesh?

Any updates here? I'd like to include this for 3.9 -next with cc:
stable to finally allow distros to enable DMAR/IOMMU support by
default on Intel hw. The current state of affairs is simply
embarrassing imo :(
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/