Re: Should SPARC use cpuidle?
From: Len Brown
Date: Tue Feb 12 2013 - 13:03:17 EST
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>> Can you please move the definition of sparc_idle to processor_32.h
>> It is sparc32 specific - and then we do not need the __ASSEMBLY__ guards
>> as the sparc32 variant are not used from assembler.
> sure, let me know if attached works.
ugh, not accustomed to sending patches via thunderbird.
hopefully this attachment works...