Re: [PATCH 1/9] virtio: add functions for piecewise addition of buffers
From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Tue Feb 12 2013 - 10:48:54 EST
Il 12/02/2013 16:43, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 04:32:27PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 12/02/2013 15:56, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>>>>> + * virtqueue_start_buf - start building buffer for the other end
>>>>> + * @vq: the struct virtqueue we're talking about.
>>>>> + * @data: the token identifying the buffer.
>>>>> + * @nents: the number of buffers that will be added
>>> This function starts building one buffer, number of buffers
>>> is a bit weird here.
>>>>> + * @nsg: the number of sg lists that will be added
>>> This means number of calls to add_sg ? Not sure why this matters.
>>> How about we pass in in_num/out_num - that is total # of sg,
>>> same as add_buf?
>> It is used to choose between direct and indirect.
> total number of in and out should be enough for this, no?
Originally, I used nsg/nents because I wanted to use mixed direct and
indirect buffers. nsg/nents let me choose between full direct (nsg ==
nents), mixed (num_free >= nsg), full indirect (num_free < nsg). Then I
had to give up because QEMU does not support it, but I still would like
to keep that open in the API.
In this series, however, I am still using nsg to choose between direct
and indirect. I would like to use dirtect for small scatterlists, even
if they are surrounded by a request/response headers/footers.
>>>>> + * virtqueue_add_sg - add sglist to buffer being built
>>>>> + * @_vq: the virtqueue for which the buffer is being built
>>>>> + * @sgl: the description of the buffer(s).
>>>>> + * @nents: the number of items to process in sgl
>>>>> + * @dir: whether the sgl is read or written (DMA_TO_DEVICE/DMA_FROM_DEVICE only)
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Note that, unlike virtqueue_add_buf, this function follows chained
>>>>> + * scatterlists, and stops before the @nents-th item if a scatterlist item
>>>>> + * has a marker.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Caller must ensure we don't call this with other virtqueue operations
>>>>> + * at the same time (except where noted).
>>> Hmm so if you want to add in and out, need separate calls?
>>> in_num/out_num would be nicer?
>> If you want to add in and out just use virtqueue_add_buf...
> I thought the point of this one is maximum flexibility.
Maximum flexibility does not include doing everything in one call (the
other way round in fact: you already need to wrap with start/end, hence
doing one or two extra add_sg calls is not important).
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/