Re: [v2 3/3] ARM: tegra: Unify Device tree board files

From: Stephen Warren
Date: Mon Feb 11 2013 - 18:54:12 EST


On 02/10/2013 11:05 PM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Unify board-dt-tegra{30,114} to the Tegra20 DT board file, "tegra.c".

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Makefile

> obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ) += cpu-tegra.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEGRA_PCI) += pcie.o
>
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC) += tegra.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC) += board-dt-tegra30.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_114_SOC) += board-dt-tegra114.o
> +obj-y += tegra.o
> +

I think I'd be tempted to move that line together with all the others
that don't depend on some config option.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c

> -static struct of_dev_auxdata tegra20_auxdata_lookup[] __initdata = {
> +static struct of_dev_auxdata tegra_auxdata_lookup[] __initdata = {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC
> OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-ehci", 0xC5000000, "tegra-ehci.0",
> &tegra_ehci1_pdata),
> OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-ehci", 0xC5004000, "tegra-ehci.1",
> &tegra_ehci2_pdata),
> OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-ehci", 0xC5008000, "tegra-ehci.2",
> &tegra_ehci3_pdata),
> +#endif
> {}
> };

Why ifdef? This is certainly small enough that it shouldn't matter for
any Tegra30- or Tegra114-kernel, and it's hopefully going away very
soon, so I'd prefer to drop the addition of the ifdefs to avoid any
conflicts with any other changes to that table.

> static void __init trimslice_init(void)
> {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TEGRA_PCI
> int ret;
>
> ret = tegra_pcie_init(true, true);
> if (ret)
> pr_err("tegra_pci_init() failed: %d\n", ret);
> -#endif
> }
>
> static void __init harmony_init(void)
> {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TEGRA_PCI
> int ret;
>
> ret = harmony_pcie_init();
> if (ret)
> pr_err("harmony_pcie_init() failed: %d\n", ret);
> -#endif
> }

Why drop those ifdefs? Does the code still compile (link) if built for
Tegra30-only or Tegra114-only, where the Tegra PCI driver won't be
enabled, and hence those functions don't exist?

> static void __init paz00_init(void)
> @@ -129,6 +128,9 @@ static void __init tegra_dt_init_late(void)
>
> tegra_init_late();
>
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC))
> + return;

I don't think that's going to help any link issues, so I'd drop it and
keep this function simple. After all, what if someone wants to add some
non-PCI-related entry into board_init_funcs[]?

> -static const char *tegra20_dt_board_compat[] = {
> +static const char * const tegra_dt_board_compat[] = {
> "nvidia,tegra20",
> + "nvidia,tegra30",
> + "nvidia,tegra114",
> NULL
> };

It'd be best to add the newer values first. It shouldn't matter, but
currently does at least for device compatible matching, so we may as
well be consistent here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/