Re: pt_regs leak into userspace (was Re: [PATCH v3 20/71] ARC: Signalhandling)

[James Hogan]

On 11/02/13 10:13, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Monday 11 February 2013 03:06 PM, Jonas Bonn wrote:
>> On 11 February 2013 08:26, Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> The only downside of this patch is that userspace signal stack grows in size,
>>> since signal frame only cares about scratch regs (pt_regs), but has to accommodate
>>> unused placeholder for callee regs too by virtue of using user_regs_struct.
>> Is this really true?  Don't setcontext and friends require that _all_
>> the registers be part of sigcontext?
> 
> But for an ABI - callee saved regs will anyhow be saved/restored even in
> setcontext case ! So collecting it for that purpose seems useless, or am I missing
> something here.

I think Jonas' point was that signals are asynchronous, i.e. you could
get interrupted by a signal at virtually any time during the program's
execution.

Cheers
James

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/