Re: [PATCH 20/25] wimax/i2400m: fix i2400m->wake_tx_skb handling

[Tejun Heo]

On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 03:19:55PM -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 17:57 -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > i2400m_net_wake_tx() sets ->wake_tx_skb with the given skb if
> > ->wake_tx_ws is not pending; however, i2400m_wake_tx_work() could have
> > just started execution and haven't fetched -><wake_tx_skb yet.  The
> > previous packet will be leaked.
> > 
> > Update ->wake_tx_skb handling.
> > 
> > * i2400m_net_wake_tx() now tests whether the previous ->wake_tx_skb
> >   has been consumed by ->wake_tx_ws instead of testing work_pending().
> > 
> > * i2400m_net_wake_stop() is simplified similarly.  It always puts
> >   ->wake_tx_skb if non-NULL.
> > 
> > * Spurious ->wake_tx_skb dereference outside critical section dropped
> >   from i2400m_wake_tx_work().
> > 
> > Only compile tested.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Dan Williams <dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> No regressions in a quick connection check to Clear and browsing a bunch
> of pages.

Applied to wq/for-3.9-cleanups.

Thanks!

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/