Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.9

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Fri Feb 08 2013 - 14:56:20 EST

On Friday, February 08, 2013 08:06:52 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 8 February 2013 18:02, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > So as I said, please rework the fixes on top of linux-pm.git/pm-cpufreq.
> I already did. Please check for-rafael branch

Cool. This is the one I'm supposed to apply, then?

> > Moreover, I'd very much prefer it if you fixed the problems introduced by
> > b8eed8a "cpufreq: Simplify __cpufreq_remove_dev()" separately and *then* any
> > other locking problems you're seeing in the code, although people are not
> > reporting them.
> >
> > You seem to have a clear picture of how the code should work now, so that
> > won't be a big trouble I guess.
> For me all problems are fixed in the current code. :)

Sounds great. :-)


I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at