Re: [PATCH 09/14] pinctrl/abx500: use direct IRQ defines

From: Stephen Warren
Date: Fri Feb 08 2013 - 12:06:29 EST


On 02/08/2013 01:25 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Feb 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:
>
>> On 02/07/2013 02:01 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> I don't see myself on cc. Was that intentional?
>>
>> The original patch was that way; I assume git send-email only CC'd you
>> on patches written by you.
>
> No, I didn't send this patch at all.
>
> I was asking Linus if he ment to CC me, as I thought I should have been.
>
>>> I quite like the idea of this.
>>>
>>> Stephen,
>>>
>>> It doesn't mean the other patch was wrong, it just transfers the math.
>>
>> Ah, I see. The issue is that the code below clearly calculates the hwirq
>> differently, and it wasn't immediately obvious that this part of the
>> patch for example:
>>
>>> struct abx500_gpio_irq_cluster ab8500_gpio_irq_cluster[] = {
>>> - GPIO_IRQ_CLUSTER(6, 13, 34),
>>> - GPIO_IRQ_CLUSTER(24, 25, 24),
>>> - GPIO_IRQ_CLUSTER(36, 41, 14),
>>> + GPIO_IRQ_CLUSTER(6, 13, AB8500_INT_GPIO6R),
>>> + GPIO_IRQ_CLUSTER(24, 25, AB8500_INT_GPIO24R),
>>> + GPIO_IRQ_CLUSTER(36, 41, AB8500_INT_GPIO36R),
>>> };
>>
>> ... actually changes the values in the table (AB8500_INT_GPIO6R is 40,
>> so when using that value, you need to subtract of the value 6 for the
>> base to get the original 34).
>
> Yes, I see how that may of looked if you didn't see the other change.
>
> So you're happy?

Yes.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/