Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: atkernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
From: Sedat Dilek
Date: Fri Feb 08 2013 - 11:28:19 EST
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Nah, I pulled in latest pm-next where this commit is new...
>>> commit 8d5666f3456f2fd4a4e5dced228475b829851e53
>>> "ACPI: Unbind ACPI drv when probe failed"
>>> ...building with it.
>>> Same to you, say concretely which commit is fixing what...
>>> Pull-N-B-Happy was never my strategy... I want to understand what went
>>> wrong and have stolen my time.
>> I don't have any pointers to broken tree and so can't point you to the culprit,
>> but it was this patch:
>> the patch i sent you as attachment.
>> There were some locking introduced around init/exit of cpufreq_driver, which
>> caused some drivers to break. Its fixed now in the above commit.
> Hmm, this "high-patch-maths" is not user-friendly!
> I will pull-in your tree into Linux-Next (next-20130208) and see if it
> applies cleanly.
> - Sedat -
No, it did NOT apply cleanly and I merged your tree like this.
To me it does not look like your changes from the patch you sent me
- Sedat -
Description: Binary data