Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: Implement locking for super clock

[Peter De Schrijver]

On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 07:57:42PM +0100, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Peter De Schrijver (2013-02-07 08:24:14)
> > Although tegra_clk_register_super_mux() has a lock parameter, the lock is not
> > actually used by the code. Fixed with this patch.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/tegra/clk-super.c |   18 +++++++++++++++---
> >  1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-super.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-super.c
> > index 7ad48a8..2fd924d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-super.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-super.c
> > @@ -73,7 +73,12 @@ static int clk_super_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
> >  {
> >         struct tegra_clk_super_mux *mux = to_clk_super_mux(hw);
> >         u32 val, state;
> > +       int err = 0;
> >         u8 parent_index, shift;
> > +       unsigned long flags = 0;
> 
> I don't think initializing flags to zero is necessary but it is not a
> big deal.  Is gcc throwing a warning?  Otherwise:
> 

Yes. gcc throws a warning if it's not initialized.

Cheers,

Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/