Re: [PATCH] IRQ CORE: irq_work_queue function return value not used.

[Frederic Weisbecker]

2013/2/2 anish kumar <anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 17:24 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> 2012/11/3 anish kumar <anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> > From: anish kumar <anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function
>> > it is better to just make it void.
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: anish kumar <anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> >  kernel/irq_work.c |    5 ++---
>> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
>> > index 1588e3b..4829a31 100644
>> > --- a/kernel/irq_work.c
>> > +++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
>> > @@ -79,17 +79,16 @@ static void __irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)
>> >   *
>> >   * Can be re-enqueued while the callback is still in progress.
>> >   */
>> > -bool irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)
>> > +void irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)
>>
>> Please also update the headers in include/linux/irq_work.h accordingly.
> I have sent the patch again(some time back).Is it picked up?
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1667796

Yep, I'm applying it and if it passes basic tests I'll relay it to Ingo.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/