Re: [PATCH] IRQ CORE: irq_work_queue function return value notused.

[anish kumar]

On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 17:24 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 2012/11/3 anish kumar <anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > From: anish kumar <anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function
> > it is better to just make it void.
> >
> > Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: anish kumar <anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  kernel/irq_work.c |    5 ++---
> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
> > index 1588e3b..4829a31 100644
> > --- a/kernel/irq_work.c
> > +++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
> > @@ -79,17 +79,16 @@ static void __irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)
> >   *
> >   * Can be re-enqueued while the callback is still in progress.
> >   */
> > -bool irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)
> > +void irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)
> 
> Please also update the headers in include/linux/irq_work.h accordingly.
I have sent the patch again(some time back).Is it picked up?
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1667796
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> >  {
> >         if (!irq_work_claim(work)) {
> >                 /*
> >                  * Already enqueued, can't do!
> >                  */
> > -               return false;
> > +               return;
> >         }
> >
> >         __irq_work_queue(work);
> > -       return true;
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_work_queue);
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.1
> >


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/