Re: [resend][PATCH 03/16] dmaengine: introduce is_slave_xfer function

[Viresh Kumar]

n 9 January 2013 19:20, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +static inline bool is_slave_xfer(enum dma_transfer_direction direction)
>> +{
>> +     return (direction == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) || (direction == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
>> +}
> After reading the subsequent patch I understand what is intent here. Perhaps
> is_slave_dirn() would have been a beter one...

dirn isn't readable, it took me some time to understand the intent...
Either have xfer or direction :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/