Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: Fix WARNINGS that result when DMA mappingis not checked

From: Larry Finger
Date: Thu Dec 27 2012 - 15:44:39 EST


On 12/27/2012 02:05 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 13:42 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
With 3.8-rc1, the first call of pci_map_single() that is not checked
with a corresponding pci_dma_mapping_error() call results in a warning
with a splat as follows:

WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:933 check_unmap+0x480/0x950()
Hardware name: HP Pavilion dv2700 Notebook PC
forcedeth 0000:00:0a.0: DMA-API: device driver failed to check
map error[device address=0x00000000b176e002] [size=90 bytes] [mapped as single]

Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c
index 653487d..de39cf2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c
@@ -1821,6 +1821,11 @@ static int nv_alloc_rx(struct net_device *dev)
skb->data,
skb_tailroom(skb),
PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
+ if (pci_dma_mapping_error(np->pci_dev,
+ np->put_rx_ctx->dma)) {
+ dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);

skb has no destructor yet, kfree_skb(skb) should be fine

OK.


+ goto packet_dropped;
+ }
np->put_rx_ctx->dma_len = skb_tailroom(skb);
np->put_rx.orig->buf = cpu_to_le32(np->put_rx_ctx->dma);
wmb();
@@ -1830,6 +1835,7 @@ static int nv_alloc_rx(struct net_device *dev)
if (unlikely(np->put_rx_ctx++ == np->last_rx_ctx))
np->put_rx_ctx = np->first_rx_ctx;
} else {
+packet_dropped:
u64_stats_update_begin(&np->swstats_rx_syncp);
np->stat_rx_dropped++;
u64_stats_update_end(&np->swstats_rx_syncp);
@@ -1856,6 +1862,11 @@ static int nv_alloc_rx_optimized(struct net_device *dev)
skb->data,
skb_tailroom(skb),
PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
+ if (pci_dma_mapping_error(np->pci_dev,
+ np->put_rx_ctx->dma)) {
+ dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
+ goto packet_dropped;
+ }
np->put_rx_ctx->dma_len = skb_tailroom(skb);
np->put_rx.ex->bufhigh = cpu_to_le32(dma_high(np->put_rx_ctx->dma));
np->put_rx.ex->buflow = cpu_to_le32(dma_low(np->put_rx_ctx->dma));
@@ -1866,6 +1877,7 @@ static int nv_alloc_rx_optimized(struct net_device *dev)
if (unlikely(np->put_rx_ctx++ == np->last_rx_ctx))
np->put_rx_ctx = np->first_rx_ctx;
} else {
+packet_dropped:
u64_stats_update_begin(&np->swstats_rx_syncp);
np->stat_rx_dropped++;
u64_stats_update_end(&np->swstats_rx_syncp);
@@ -2217,6 +2229,9 @@ static netdev_tx_t nv_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
bcnt = (size > NV_TX2_TSO_MAX_SIZE) ? NV_TX2_TSO_MAX_SIZE : size;
np->put_tx_ctx->dma = pci_map_single(np->pci_dev, skb->data + offset, bcnt,
PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
+ if (pci_dma_mapping_error(np->pci_dev,
+ np->put_tx_ctx->dma))
+ return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;

Really this is not going to work very well : caller will call this in a
loop.

Any suggestions on what value should be returned, or does the caller need to be modified?

Thanks for the review,

Larry

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/