Re: [RFC v4+ hot_track 14/19] vfs: add debugfs support

From: Zhi Yong Wu
Date: Wed Nov 07 2012 - 02:49:19 EST


On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 7:45 AM, David Sterba <dave@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:30:56PM +0800, zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> +static int hot_range_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>> +{
>> + struct hot_range_item *hr = v;
>> + struct hot_inode_item *he = hr->hot_inode;
>> + struct hot_freq_data *freq_data = &hr->hot_range.hot_freq_data;
>> +
>> + /* Always lock hot_inode_item first */
>> + spin_lock(&he->hot_inode.lock);
>> + spin_lock(&hr->hot_range.lock);
>> + seq_printf(seq, "inode #%llu, range start " \
>
> the # seems unnecessary to me
OK, removed.
>
>> + "%llu (range len %u) reads %u, writes %u, "
>> + "avg read time %llu, avg write time %llu, temp %u\n",
>
> compiler will complain if it sees a %llu format and not the expected
> type of 'unsigned long long'
When built, i haven't seen any warning report about this...
>
>> + he->i_ino,
>
> (unsigned long long)he->i_ino,
>
>> + (u64)hr->start * RANGE_SIZE,
>> + hr->len,
>> + freq_data->nr_reads,
>> + freq_data->nr_writes,
>> + freq_data->avg_delta_reads / NSEC_PER_MSEC,
>> + freq_data->avg_delta_writes / NSEC_PER_MSEC,
>> + freq_data->last_temp >> (32 - HEAT_MAP_BITS));
>> + spin_unlock(&hr->hot_range.lock);
>> + spin_unlock(&he->hot_inode.lock);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int hot_inode_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>> +{
>> + struct hot_inode_item *he = v;
>> + struct hot_freq_data *freq_data = &he->hot_inode.hot_freq_data;
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&he->hot_inode.lock);
>> + seq_printf(seq, "inode #%llu, reads %u, writes %u, " \
>> + "avg read time %llu, avg write time %llu, temp %u\n",
>
> (same here)
ditto.
>
>> + he->i_ino,
>> + freq_data->nr_reads,
>> + freq_data->nr_writes,
>> + freq_data->avg_delta_reads / NSEC_PER_MSEC,
>> + freq_data->avg_delta_writes / NSEC_PER_MSEC,
>> + freq_data->last_temp >> (32 - HEAT_MAP_BITS));
>> + spin_unlock(&he->hot_inode.lock);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>>
>> +static void *hot_spot_range_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
>> +{
>> + struct hot_info *root = seq->private;
>> + struct hot_range_item *hr_next, *hr = v;
>> + struct hot_comm_item *comm_item;
>> + struct list_head *n_list;
>> + int i =
>> + hr->hot_range.hot_freq_data.last_temp >> (32 - HEAT_MAP_BITS);
>
> now I have noticed that I've seen the ... (32 - HEAT_MAP_BITS)
> expression so many times that it tend to think it deserves a helper
> function
This helper function has existed, hot_raw_shift(), i will replace this with it.
>
>> +
>> + n_list = seq_list_next(&hr->hot_range.n_list,
>> + &root->heat_range_map[i].node_list, pos);
>> + hot_range_item_put(hr);
>> +next:
>> + if (n_list) {
>> + comm_item = container_of(n_list,
>> + struct hot_comm_item, n_list);
>> + hr_next = container_of(comm_item,
>> + struct hot_range_item, hot_range);
>> + kref_get(&hr_next->hot_range.refs);
>> + return hr_next;
>> + } else if (--i >= 0) {
>> + n_list = seq_list_next(&root->heat_range_map[i].node_list,
>> + &root->heat_range_map[i].node_list, pos);
>> + goto next;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void hot_debugfs_exit(struct super_block *sb)
>> +{
>> + struct dentry *vol_dentry;
>> +
>> + vol_dentry = debugfs_get_dentry(sb->s_id,
>> + sb->s_hot_root->debugfs_root, strlen(sb->s_id));
>> + /* remove all debugfs entries recursively from the volume root */
>> + if (vol_dentry)
>> + debugfs_remove_recursive(vol_dentry);
>> + else
>> + BUG_ON(1);
>
> BUG()
done, thanks.
>
>> +
>> + if (list_empty(&sb->s_hot_root->debugfs_root->d_subdirs))
>> + debugfs_remove(sb->s_hot_root->debugfs_root);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>
> david



--
Regards,

Zhi Yong Wu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/