Re: [PATCH 002/193] checkpatch: warn about using CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL

From: Andy Whitcroft
Date: Tue Oct 23 2012 - 18:59:37 EST


On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:01:15PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> This config item has not carried much meaning for a while now and is
> almost always enabled by default. As agreed during the Linux kernel
> summit, it is being removed. This will discourage future addition of
> CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL while it is being phased out.
>
> Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 21a9f5d..37dc932 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -1757,6 +1757,13 @@ sub process {
> #print "is_start<$is_start> is_end<$is_end> length<$length>\n";
> }
>
> +# Discourage the addition of CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL in Kconfig.
> + if ($realfile =~ /Kconfig/ &&
> + $line =~ /.\s*depends on\s+.*\bEXPERIMENTAL\b/) {
> + WARN("CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL",
> + "Use of CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL is deprecated.\n");
> + }
> +

Seem reasonable. Should you suggest how they can mark things
experimental? I assume (EXPERIMENTAL) in the title is now the right
way?

> if (($realfile =~ /Makefile.*/ || $realfile =~ /Kbuild.*/) &&
> ($line =~ /\+(EXTRA_[A-Z]+FLAGS).*/)) {
> my $flag = $1;

-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/