Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] ARM: OMAP: iommu: optimize save and restore routines

From: Omar Ramirez Luna
Date: Tue Sep 18 2012 - 20:53:57 EST


Hi Tony,

On 18 September 2012 13:04, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> * Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna@xxxxxxxxxx> [120912 12:47]:
>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/iommu.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/iommu.h
>> @@ -27,6 +27,13 @@ struct iotlb_entry {
>> };
>> };
>>
>> +/* context registers */
>> +struct iommu_regs {
>> + u32 irqen;
>> + u32 cntl;
>> + u32 ttb;
>> +};
>> +
>> struct omap_iommu {
>> const char *name;
>> struct module *owner;
>> @@ -50,7 +57,8 @@ struct omap_iommu {
>> struct list_head mmap;
>> struct mutex mmap_lock; /* protect mmap */
>>
>> - void *ctx; /* iommu context: registres saved area */
>> + struct iommu_regs context;
>> + int ctx_loss_cnt;
>> u32 da_start;
>> u32 da_end;
>> };
>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/iommu2.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/iommu2.h
>> @@ -35,8 +35,6 @@
>> #define MMU_READ_RAM 0x6c
>> #define MMU_EMU_FAULT_AD 0x70
>>
>> -#define MMU_REG_SIZE 256
>> -
>> /*
>> * MMU Register bit definitions
>> */
>
> These headers should be moved to include/linux/platform_data/iommu-omap.h
> or something like that. Care to take care of that too?
>
> I guess there's no reason to have both iommu.h and iommuh2.h?

Agree, can this be made as part of a separate cleanup series? I was
hoping these could make it for 3.7 so we could have a usable rpmsg for
omap4.

Regards,

Omar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/