[tip:x86/asm] x86: Prefer TZCNT over BFS

From: tip-bot for Jan Beulich
Date: Fri Sep 14 2012 - 02:23:34 EST


Commit-ID: 5870661c091e827973674cc3469b50c959008c2b
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/5870661c091e827973674cc3469b50c959008c2b
Author: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:24:43 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:44:01 +0200

x86: Prefer TZCNT over BFS

Following a relatively recent compiler change, make use of the
fact that for non-zero input BSF and TZCNT produce the same
result, and that CPUs not knowing of TZCNT will treat the
instruction as BSF (i.e. ignore what looks like a REP prefix to
them). The assumption here is that TZCNT would never have worse
performance than BSF.

For the moment, only do this when the respective generic-CPU
option is selected (as there are no specific-CPU options
covering the CPUs supporting TZCNT), and don't do that when size
optimization was requested.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/504DEA1B020000780009A277@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
index ebaee69..b2af664 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
@@ -347,6 +347,19 @@ static int test_bit(int nr, const volatile unsigned long *addr);
? constant_test_bit((nr), (addr)) \
: variable_test_bit((nr), (addr)))

+#if (defined(CONFIG_X86_GENERIC) || defined(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU)) \
+ && !defined(CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE)
+/*
+ * Since BSF and TZCNT have sufficiently similar semantics for the purposes
+ * for which we use them here, BMI-capable hardware will decode the prefixed
+ * variant as 'tzcnt ...' and may execute that faster than 'bsf ...', while
+ * older hardware will ignore the REP prefix and decode it as 'bsf ...'.
+ */
+# define BSF_PREFIX "rep;"
+#else
+# define BSF_PREFIX
+#endif
+
/**
* __ffs - find first set bit in word
* @word: The word to search
@@ -355,7 +368,7 @@ static int test_bit(int nr, const volatile unsigned long *addr);
*/
static inline unsigned long __ffs(unsigned long word)
{
- asm("bsf %1,%0"
+ asm(BSF_PREFIX "bsf %1,%0"
: "=r" (word)
: "rm" (word));
return word;
@@ -369,12 +382,14 @@ static inline unsigned long __ffs(unsigned long word)
*/
static inline unsigned long ffz(unsigned long word)
{
- asm("bsf %1,%0"
+ asm(BSF_PREFIX "bsf %1,%0"
: "=r" (word)
: "r" (~word));
return word;
}

+#undef BSF_PREFIX
+
/*
* __fls: find last set bit in word
* @word: The word to search
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/