Re: [PATCH 13/16] ARM: omap: move platform_data definitions

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Tuesday 11 September 2012, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> Just curious to know how you came with some of the above header names ?
> 
> plat/mcbsp ---> dsp-mcbsp.h
> There is no connection of DSP with McBSP. "omap-mcbsp.h" would been a
> better name.

This one was a mistake on my side, as Tony and  Peter already pointed out.
How about asoc-mcbsp.h or asoc-omap-mcbsp.h?

> plat/nand.h --> /mtd-nand-omap2.h
> plat/onenand.h --> /mtd-onenand-omap2.h
> May be "omap-nand.h" and "omap-onenand.h"
> 
> plat/mcspi.h-->spi-omap2-mcspi.h
> May be "omap-spi.h"
> 

As I wrote in the introductory mail, I tried to always prefix the file
names with the subsystem, followed by the name of the driver, in order
to standardize on just one set of rules.

The drivers implementing the three headers above are:

drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
drivers/mtd/onenand/omap2.c
drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c

so these all seem appropriate.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/