Re: [PATCH 1/1] tcp: Wrong timeout for SYN segments

From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Thu Aug 23 2012 - 08:15:24 EST


On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 13:58 +0200, Alex Bergmann wrote:
> On 08/22/2012 06:41 PM, H.K. Jerry Chu wrote:

> > This issue occurred to me right after I submitted the patch for RFC6298.
> > I did not commit any more change because RFC compliance aside, 180secs
> > just seem like eternity in the Internet age.
> >
> > (See my past post on this at
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=130759078118866&w=2)
>
> Okay, I missed that post during my search about the current situation.

I would suggest to increase TCP_SYN_RETRIES from 5 to 6.

180 secs is eternity, but 31 secs is too small.

Can you repost a v2, only changing TCP_SYN_RETRIES ?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/