Re: [PATCH]: Autosleep patch.

[Randy Dunlap]

On 08/06/2012 08:13 AM, Christopher Sacchi wrote:

> This patch (listed below), changes an old function in autosleep.c in
> kernel version 3.5. It's code is listed from the first -- line to the
> 2nd to last -- line.
> This patch was checked with checkpatch.pl with no errors:
> --
> --- power/autosleep.c	2012-07-21 20:58:29.000000000 +0000
> +++ power/autosleepnew.c	2012-08-06 10:52:26.000000000 +0000


The file names should include the full path from the top level of the
kernel source tree.  E.g.:

--- linux.orig/kernel/power/autosleep.c
+++ linux/kernel/power/autosleep.c

This patch uses the name autosleepnew.c, which is not what is
required/expected.

Your previous patches were for wireless (mac80211) components, so they
needed to go to the linux-wireless mailing list.  This patch is not
about wireless, so don't send it to that mailing list, although you
could send it to the linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailing list.
Please see the MAINTAINERS file for where to send patches.


> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static void try_to_suspend(struct work_s
>  	if (!pm_get_wakeup_count(&initial_count, true))
>  		goto out;
> 
> -	mutex_lock(&autosleep_lock);
> +	mutex_lock_interruptable();
> 
>  	if (!pm_save_wakeup_count(initial_count)) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&autosleep_lock);
> Signed-off-by: Christopher P. Sacchi <chris.sacchi@xxxxxxxxx>
> --

Signed-off-by: line is not part of the patch.  It should be near the
end of the patch description, before the actual patch.

Again, please read and follow Documentation/SubmittingPatches.

thanks.

-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/