Is iommu_num_pages() broken ?

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

Hi folks !

I stumbled upon this today:

static inline unsigned long iommu_num_pages(unsigned long addr,
					    unsigned long len,
					    unsigned long io_page_size)
{
	unsigned long size = (addr & (io_page_size - 1)) + len;

	return DIV_ROUND_UP(size, io_page_size);
}
 

That doesn't look right to me...

The powerpc iommu code at least uses that with an addr which may not be
page aligned (ie, result of sg_virt() which include the offset).

The above code will align the start before adding the len which is wrong
and will result in potentially missing a page or am I missing
something ?

Shouldn't it be something like

static inline unsigned long iommu_num_pages(unsigned long addr,
					    unsigned long len,
					    unsigned long io_page_size)
{
	unsigned long start = addr & (io_page_size - 1);
	unsigned long end = addr + len;

	return DIV_ROUND_UP(end - start, io_page_size);
}

?

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/