Re: [RFC v2 1/7] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Fri Aug 03 2012 - 18:29:28 EST


On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I actually meant an enclosing struct. When you're defining a struct
> member, simply putting the storage after a struct with var array
> should be good enough. If that doesn't work, quite a few things in
> the kernel will break.

The unsigned member of a struct has to be the last one, so your struct
won't work.

Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/