Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/24] arm: initial Xen support

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk]

On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:35:51AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 19:27 +0100, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On 07/26/2012 10:33 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > - Basic hypervisor.h and interface.h definitions.
> > > - Skelethon enlighten.c, set xen_start_info to an empty struct.
> > > - Do not limit xen_initial_domain to PV guests.
> > > 
> > > The new code only compiles when CONFIG_XEN is set, that is going to be
> > > added to arch/arm/Kconfig in a later patch.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/Makefile                     |    1 +
> > >  arch/arm/include/asm/hypervisor.h     |    6 +++
> > >  arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h |   19 ++++++++++
> > >  arch/arm/include/asm/xen/interface.h  |   64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 
> > These headers don't seem particularly ARM specific. Could they be moved
> > to asm-generic or include/linux?
> 
> Or perhaps include/xen.
> 
> A bunch of it also looks like x86 specific stuff which has crept in.
> e.g. PARAVIRT_LAZY_FOO and paravirt_get_lazy_mode() are arch/x86
> specific and shouldn't be called from common code (and aren't, AFAICT).

The could be moved out..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/