Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] clk: add DT clock binding support

[Shawn Guo]

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 09:41:48AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> +struct clk *of_clk_get_from_provider(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec)
> +{
> +	struct of_clk_provider *provider;
> +	struct clk *clk = NULL;

Both clk and clkdev treat NULL as a valid clock and return ERR_PTR for
error case, while all the codes in this patch just return NULL for
error and check (clk != NULL) for valid clock.

Should we force the consistent behavior between DT and non-DT on this?

> +
> +	/* Check if we have such a provider in our array */
> +	mutex_lock(&of_clk_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry(provider, &of_clk_providers, link) {
> +		if (provider->node == clkspec->np)
> +			clk = provider->get(clkspec, provider->data);
> +		if (clk)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&of_clk_lock);
> +
> +	return clk;
> +}

-- 
Regards,
Shawn

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/