Re: Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Jun 12 2012 - 12:45:33 EST


On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 13:20 +0300, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> you are very fundamentally wrong if you think the distance array has
> to be symmetric.

I just checked, both QPI and HT are bi-directional links so anything
mid-sized x86 had better be symmetric. Big numa can of course stick in
their own interconnects and might do uni-directional stuff, although I
doubt anybody still does that.

The distance table I have for a 4096 cpu SGI machine is fully symmetric
for instance.

This of course doesn't mean we should make hard assumptions about this
in the scheduler -- and we don't. But in this case it does mean the HP
table is very funny indeed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/