Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent fixes for v3.5

[Chen]

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:31 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 10:57 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Also, we can rebase the whole branch and get rid of this one and
>>> of the merge commit it has.
>>
>> I took it, but it was really unnecessary.
>>
>> There were printk() patches in the queue and being discussed that
>> needed this, but I wouldn't have pulled the end result if they hadn't
>> been fixed.
>>
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> Just for clarification - do you want the patch reverted?  My reading of
> what you wrote (as well as of the patch) is that it was an unnecessary
> (redundant) patch, but Ingo is worried that you are saying it is incorrect.
>
>        -hpa
>
> --
> H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Really redundant.The author is just re-implement the same
things.(Seems he disnt know that this is already implement.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/