Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/6] time: keep track of the pending utc/taithreshold

[Richard Cochran]

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:50:13AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> 
> Thus the only additional state you might need over what we already
> have is the next_leap value.

And that is BTW exactly what my patches do.

The added enumerated state variable 'leap_state' in timekeeper.c is
balanced by the removal of 'time_state' in ntp.c.

Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/