Re: [PATCH 2/5] regulator: tps65910: set of_node for regulator registerconfig

[Laxman Dewangan]

On Saturday 19 May 2012 11:18 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 08:04:07PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
>
>
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > -		config.of_node = of_find_node_by_name(tps65910->dev->of_node,
> > +		if (reg_node)
> > +			config.of_node = of_find_node_by_name(reg_node,
> >   							info->name);
> > -#endif
> ...it's changing the value that's being configured.  The changelog
> doesn't explain why this is being done.
>
> Also, why is the ifdef being removed - won't that break the build?
Yaah there is no function for non-dt case and should we add that in of.h?
static inline struct device_node *of_find_node_by_name(struct 
device_node *from,
        const char *name)
{
    return NULL;
}

In this case it will not need to have #ifdef CONFIG_OF in the client code?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/